Showing posts with label History. Show all posts
Showing posts with label History. Show all posts

January 18, 2013

The Second Amendment: America's Defense Against Tyranny

The Second Amendment: America's Defense Against Tyranny

In the recent weeks since the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, anti American progressive filth like Piers Morgan and the like have gone to extreme lengths to demonize American gun owners and supporters of our inalienable right to keep and bear arms as acknowledged in the second amendment to the US Constitution.  

According to Piers Morgan, during a broadcast with his guest Ben Shapiro, the idea of the American government becoming tyrannical is "absurd".   Prior to that, he scoffed at radio show host Alex Jones for believing the US government would ever become tyrannical.

 Contrary to what unintelligent imbeciles like Piers Morgan think or claim to be absurd in regards to tyranny, history proves over and over that governments can and did turn against the people and become one of a tyrannical nature.

 It is dumbfounding that anyone could argue the deceptive falsehood that our own government isn't heading towards one of tyranny when all the warning signs are clear as day, proving that, yes, tyranny IS currently possible in America.

Over the last decade, the government has been systematically restricting the rights and liberties of the American people all under the false pretense of "security", and has gone to extreme lengths in implementation of a massive total surveillance police state rivaling that of the former GDR Ministerium für Staatssicherheit commonly known as Stasi.      Anyone who believes our government couldn't ever, or wouldn't ever become one of tyrants is suffering cognitive dissonance, or perhaps is either delusional, or are so far left that they actually support it and want it to happen, therefore do anything they can to make sure it happens.

All the signs are there, proving that YES, our government IS progressing towards tyranny as shown in this list of signs of tyranny from Jon Roland's article, Principles of Tyranny.

The methodology of tyranny

The methods used to overthrow a constitutional order and establish a tyranny are well-known. However, despite this awareness, it is surprising how those who have no intention of perpetrating a tyranny can slip into these methods and bring about a tyranny despite their best intentions. Tyranny does not have to be deliberate. Tyrants can fool themselves as thoroughly as they fool everyone else.
  • Control of public information and opinion
It begins with withholding information, and leads to putting out false or misleading information. A government can develop ministries of propaganda under many guises. They typically call it "public information" or "marketing" 
  • Vote fraud used to prevent the election of reformers
  • It doesn't matter which of the two major party candidates are elected if no real reformer can get nominated, and when news services start knowing the outcomes of elections before it is possible for them to know, then the votes are not being honestly counted.
    • Undue official influence on trials and juries
    Nonrandom selection of jury panels, exclusion of those opposed to the law, exclusion of the jury from hearing argument on the law, exclusion of private prosecutors from access to the grand jury, and prevention of parties and their counsels from making effective arguments or challenging the government.
    • Usurpation of undelegated powers
    This is usually done with popular support for solving some problem, or to redistribute wealth to the advantage of the supporters of the dominant faction, but it soon leads to the deprivation of rights of minorities and individuals.
    • Seeking a government monopoly on the capability and use of armed force
    The first signs are efforts to register or restrict the possession and use of firearms, initially under the guise of "protecting" the public, which, when it actually results in increased crime, provides a basis for further disarmament efforts affecting more people and more weapons.
    • Militarization of law enforcement
    Declaring a "war on crime" that becomes a war on civil liberties. Preparation of military forces for internal policing duties.
    • Infiltration and subversion of citizen groups that could be forces for reform
    Internal spying and surveillance is the beginning. A sign is false prosecutions of their leaders.
    • Suppression of investigators and whistleblowers
    When people who try to uncover high level wrongdoing are threatened, that is a sign the system is not only riddled with corruption, but that the corruption has passed the threshold into active tyranny.
    • Use of the law for competition suppression
    It begins with the dominant faction winning support by paying off their supporters and suppressing their supporters' competitors, but leads to public officials themselves engaging in illegal activities and using the law to suppress independent competitors. A good example of this is narcotics trafficking.
    • Subversion of internal checks and balances
    This involves the appointment to key positions of persons who can be controlled by their sponsors, and who are then induced to do illegal things. The worst way in which this occurs is in the appointment of judges that will go along with unconstitutional acts by the other branches.
    • Creation of a class of officials who are above the law
    This is indicated by dismissal of charges for wrongdoing against persons who are "following orders".
    • Increasing dependency of the people on government
    The classic approach to domination of the people is to first take everything they have away from them, then make them compliant with the demands of the rulers to get anything back again.
    • Increasing public ignorance of their civic duties and reluctance to perform them
    When the people avoid doing things like voting and serving in militias and juries, tyranny is not far behind.
    • Use of staged events to produce popular support
    Acts of terrorism, blamed on political opponents, followed immediately with well-prepared proposals for increased powers and budgets for suppressive agencies. Sometimes called a Reichstag plot.
    • Conversion of rights into privileges
    Requiring licenses and permits for doing things that the government does not have the delegated power to restrict, except by due process in which the burden of proof is on the petitioner.
    • Political correctness
    Many if not most people are susceptible to being recruited to engage in repressive actions against disfavored views or behaviors, and led to pave the way for the dominance of tyrannical government.

    As you can see, it is ALREADY HAPPENING, yet so many Americans fail to recognize this and go on in their delusional fantasy of being "free".

    When you attempt to educate the modern progressive swine on the realities of American government, rather than use fact, they resort to emotional response derived from their personal belief,s not evidence.  In any discussion on the second amendment involving self defense against the government and tyranny, the clueless modern lib resorts to misleading claims that people have no chance against the government, because "they have tanks, planes, etc" and they cling to the false notion that our own Armed Forces would beat us to a pulp, which is far from the truth, because the majority of active duty soldiers and veterans are on the side of WE THE PEOPLE and would NOT take up arms against the American people.

    Without a large enough military capability against any potential insurgency, the government would resort to using law enforcement officers and foreign armies, most likely to include United Nations "peacekeeping" forces, however, what these brainwashed sheep fail to recall when they believe the people can't fight the government is the fact that modern armies are trained in fighting other organized and trained military, not common people defending their homeland, as proven time and time again in conflicts like Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Syria, etc..  Citizens most certainly CAN fight the government, even win.. 

    Fighting a determined people safeguarding their own liberty is an entirely different metric and the government is at a severe disadvantage. When one looks at the world today, it becomes crystal clear that we the American people have the upper hand.   Americans are far more armed than any army in the world and in comparison would dwarf that of any past insurgency in history..... Americans are the largest body of well armed people on earth, so..... COME AND TAKE THEM!!!!!!!

    December 28, 2012

    History and Statistics Prove Gun Bans and Gun Control are Dangerous

    History and Statistics Prove That Gun Bans and Gun Control Legislation are Dangerous to Freedom & Liberty.

    What happened at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut on the morning of December 14 is tragic.   I can not imagine the overwhelming pain and sense of loss felt by the parents, friends, family members & loved ones of those who lost their lives.

      Had I my self been one of them, I don't know what I would do, but I certainly would be devastated and in deep anguish, however, my emotions would never be enough to convince me that more restrictions on gun ownership, further gun control measures and gun bans are the answer to preventing such tragedies as this from ever happening again.

      It is pitiful that those on the left thinking side of the political spectrum are using this horrific event to advance their anti-gun agenda to disarm the American people.  From modern liberal Americans, to foreign anti-Americans, to media scum and celebrity trash and traitorous politicians, they're all screaming for gun bans and more gun control laws, and it is SICKENING, because their calls are exactly what the powers that be have wanted all along.

    Problem - Reaction - Solution.

      The Newtown shooting is these scumbags wet dream, and their jizzing in their pants in glory over this, because it gives them exactly what they have wanted for quite some time, particularly that scumbag traitor, Senator Dianne Feinstein, who has had a hard on for banning guns her entire treasonous political career.

      I find it extremely ironic that these modern liberals, the sort that often cry about their self claimed right to murder their own unborn children, can cry about murdered children and use it as another tool for preaching their anti-gun squabble.

      I find it very problematic that these modern liberal swine, the kind that piss and moan about gay marriage and other social causes they deem their right, can actually piss and moan about their rights, yet simultaneously demand the rights of others be taken away.

      The second amendment is not about hunting, nor sporting or recreation, but a profound and inalienable right, of we the people to defend ourselves against enemies, both foreign and domestic, to protect our freedom and liberty, against any government or standing armies who would attempt to over power us with tyrannical goals.    Modern liberals and many other people have very short memories, and forget history, that in EVERY INSTANCE of tyranny, that the people were disarmed before it happened.  WWII Germany is just ONE example of such.  Prior to the holocaust, Hitler enacted gun control laws, which enabled him and those in power to commit atrocities against the Jewish people and others in Germany.   This is just one example of MANY, yet, these clueless vermin hold the idea that our government would not or could not ever do no such thing even when all the signs are there to confirm and validate the thought that, YES IT CAN happen.

      These united states of America are virtually under near complete and total surveillance, much like the police state of the United Kingdom, so much so that it makes the former German Democratic Republic look like Utopia and is already far worse than the Ministerium für Staatssicherheit ever was.   Our Department of Homeland Security, with its various multitude of subsidiaries that include the Transportation Security Administration, are horrifically similar to, perhaps even more dangerous than Hitler's Geheime Staatspolizei.

    Hitler had the Reichstag fire which gave him the Enabling Act of 1933.  Eerily similar, if not nearly identical "coincidence", we the people of these united states had September 11, 2001, followed by the Patriot Act..  So, the very idea of "trusting" our government to not ever become one of tyranny is troubling.   If history teaches us anything, it is to NEVER trust governments nor those in power.   It is solely the second amendment that gives us, the people, the power, to ensure that our government can never oppress us.

    Gun control laws are NOT to protect citizens, nor to prevent crime or save lives, but to protect those in power.  Gun control is a measure of governments and those in power seeking to RULE OVER subjects with ABSOLUTE POWER.   Our government is not one of absolute power, because it is WE THE PEOPLE who had the power, and little by little, our government has been stripping away our freedoms and liberties, giving themselves more authority and power, and when they come for the guns, rest assured that every last bit of freedom thereafter CAN be taken away.

    Before you agree with, or support more gun control and gun bans, THINK TWICE about it, because it is potentially with DIRE CONSEQUENCES.

    Uneducated morons like Piers Morgan, Michael Moore & Dianne Feinstein believe that a ban on "assault weapons" would prevent tragedies like the Sandy Hook Massacre from ever happening again, however, what they fail to realize is, similar events in the past, notably the shooting massacre at Columbine High, still occurred even though there was an assault weapons ban in effect at the time.  Matter of fact, there were FAR MORE INCIDENTS during said ban.

    The FBI statistics on crime show that less than a fraction of a percent of violent crimes are committed with "assault weapons".

    Why do you need a gun?
    Like & share this image on Facebook

    The usual road to slavery is that first they take away your guns, then they take away your property, then last of all they tell you to shut up and say you are enjoying it. – James A. Donald

    After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it. I sure as hell wouldn't want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military. – William S. Burroughs

    When they took the 4th Amendment, I was quiet because I didn't deal drugs.
    When they took the 6th Amendment, I was quiet because I am innocent.
    When they took the 2nd Amendment, I was quiet because I don't own a gun.
    Now they have taken the 1st Amendment, and I can only be quiet.
    – Lyle Myhr

    Armed people are free. No state can control those who have the machinery and the will to resist, no mob can take their liberty and property. And no 220-pound thug can threaten the well-being or dignity of a 110-pound woman who has two pounds of iron to even things out … People who object to weapons aren't abolishing violence, they're begging for rule by brute force, when the biggest, strongest animals among men were always automatically right. Guns ended that, and a social democracy is a hollow farce without an armed populace to make it work. – L. Neil Smith (from The Probability Broach)

    The police can't stop an intruder, mugger, or stalker from hurting you. They can pursue him only after he has hurt or killed you. Protecting yourself from harm is your responsibility, and you are far less likely to be hurt in a neighborhood of gun owners than in one of disarmed citizens – even if you don't own a gun yourself. – Harry Browne

    To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them. – George Mason

    We should not forget that the spark which ignited the American Revolution was caused by the British attempt to confiscate the firearms of the colonists. - Patrick Henry

    More Second Amendment quotes.

    Before I end this post, I would also like to add that any bans on high capacity magazines will NOT reduce violent crime, because one, statistics show that high cap mags are rarely ever used in crimes, and two, the difference between a high capacity magazine and a standard 10 round magazine is less than 1/2 a second to reload another magazine.
    Banning high capacity magazines will NOT reduce violent crime
    Like & share this image on Facebook

    Finally, in closing, I'd like to share these truths and facts on guns and crime, from the FBI & Cato Institute.
    The Honest Truth About Guns
    From the Bastiat Institute;

    To see a policy based entirely on emotion, look at the now defunct "assault weapons" ban. What makes a weapon an "assault weapon" vs. a rifle? Often cosmetic irrelevancies, like a pistol grip or a bayonet!

    So let's get practical. What would actually minimize tragedies like the one in Newtown?

    1. Allow teachers with concealed carry permits to carry those weapons when in school, just as they are allowed to carry everywhere else. This way, a potential attacker will have no idea what kind of resistance he will face.

    2. As a suggestion, but not a requirement: recommend that schools have a few guns locked in handprint safes. These can only be opened with fingerprint matching, so no one but the correct teacher/administrator/security guard can access them.

    3. As another suggestion (thanks to Alex Wood): Just as planes started locking their cockpits after 9/11, schools may consider locking their doors. This is currently done in Nashville.

    Remember the last big policy passed based on an emotional response to a tragedy? It gave us the Department of Homeland Security, the TSA, two wars that have lasted over 10 years, trillions spent, and tens of thousands of lives lost. Let's not do that again.

    Sign the petition:
    Recommended reading;

    March 26, 2012

    WWII German War Merit Cross with Swords for Combatants Second Class For Sale

    WWII German War Merit Cross with Swords for Combatants Second Class 1939 For Sale

    Since eBay prohibits Nazi memorabilia that contains a swastika, I am posting for sale here this WWII German Knights War Merit Cross with Swords for Combatants Second Class for $70 shipped within the USA. Only ONE available and photo is of EXACT item. If you have any questions, or wish to see more photos, contact me via the comments, or send message to assholeblogger at facebook dot comIt is illegal for me to ship this medal to Germany, Italy, France, Poland, Israel and several other countries, therefore, NO INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING via the Buy it Now.  You must contact me for shipping costs for Canada and elsewhere where item is legal to ship.. If you see the buy it now button, it is still available.  Take note that I have 100% positive feedback as a seller on eBay and Auction Arms. Price is $70 SHIPPED US.


    The War Merit Cross (German: Kriegsverdienstkreuz) was a decoration of Nazi Germany during the Second World War, which could be awarded to civilians as well as military personnel. It was reissued in 1957 by the Bundeswehr in a De-Nazified version for veterans.

    This award was created by Adolf Hitler in 1939 as a successor to the non-combatant Iron Cross which was used in earlier wars (same medal but with a different ribbon). The award was graded the same as the Iron Cross: War Merit Cross Second Class, War Merit Cross First Class, and Knights Cross of the War Merit Cross. The award had two variants: with swords given to soldiers for exceptional service in battle above and beyond the call of duty (but not worthy of an Iron Cross which was more a bravery award), and without swords for meritorious service behind the lines which could also be awarded to civilians. Recipients had to have the lower grade of the award before getting the next level. There was also another version below the 2nd class simply called the War Merit Medal (German: Kriegsverdienstmedaille), set up in 1940 for civilians in order to offset the large number of 2nd class without swords being awarded. It was usually given to those workers in factories who significantly exceeded work quotas.
    One notable winner of the War Merit Cross was William Joyce (aka Lord Haw-Haw) who received both the second and first class, both without swords. Recipients of the Knights Cross of the War Merit Cross customarily received the medal from holders of the Knights Cross of the Iron Cross, to symbolize the link between the combat soldier and their supporters, who helped maintain the war effort.
    There was one extra grade of the War Merit Cross, which was created at the suggestion of Albert Speer: The Knights Cross of the War Merit Cross in Gold, but this was never officially placed on the list of national awards as it came about in 1945 and there was no time to officially promulgate the award before the war ended. The Knights Cross of the War Merit Cross in Gold (without swords) was awarded 'on paper' to two recipients on 20 April 1945: Franz Hahne and Karl-Otto Saur

    The ribbon of the War Merit Cross was in red-white-black-white-red; that was, the red and black colors being reversed from the ribbon of the World War II version of the Iron Cross. The ribbon for the War Merit Medal was similar, but with a narrow red vertical red strip in the center of the black field. Soldiers who earned the War Merit Cross 2nd Class with Swords wore a small crossed-swords device on the ribbon. The War Merit Cross 1st Class was a pin-backed medal worn on the pocket of the tunic (like the Iron Cross 1st Class). The ribbon of the War Merit Cross 2nd Class could be worn like the ribbon of the Iron Cross 2nd Class (through the third buttonhole).

    Combat soldiers tended to hold the War Merit Cross in low regard, referring to its wearers as being in 'Iron Cross Training', and prior to 28 September 1941, the War Merit Cross could not be worn with a corresponding grade of the Iron Cross, which took precedence.
    A total of 118 awards of the Knights Cross of the War Merit Cross with swords, and 137 awards of the Knights Cross of the War Merit Cross without swords were awarded. Considering the relative rarity of the award compared with the grades of the Knights Cross of the Iron Cross, it took on extra meaning. For example, Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring made a concerted effort to get Hitler to award him this order, much to Hitler's annoyance. In response, Hitler outlined a series of criteria governing the awarding of this decoration and the philosophy of such awards, and directed that "prominent party comrades" were not to be awarded with the Knights Cross of the War Merit Cross (or similar decorations), and withdrew the proposed awards of this order to Gauleiter Erich Koch and State Secretary Karl Hanke. Directing his comments at Göring personally, Hitler ordered that such attempts to gain this award be stopped (from a letter dated 27 August 1943 from Führerhauptquartier). Also, the scarcity of the award of the Knights Cross of the War Merit Cross compared with the Knights Cross of the Iron Cross gave it an "air of exclusiveness" it did not really deserve, as it ranked below the Knights Cross of the Iron Cross.

    Six persons received two Knights Cross' of the War Merit Cross (one with Swords and one without Swords): Walter Brugmann, Julius Dorpmüller, Karl-Otto Saur, Albin Sawatzki, Walter Schreiber, and Walter Rohlandt.
    Wear of Nazi era decorations was banned in Germany after the war, as was any display of the swastika. Veterans awarded the War Merit Cross were therefore unable to wear it, either in uniform or - publicly - on civilian dress. In 1957 the Federal Republic of Germany authorised alternative 'de-nazified' replacement versions of World War II period war decorations. These could be worn both on Bundeswehr uniform and in civilian dress. The new version of the War Merit Cross replaced the swastika on the obverse central disc of the cross with the date "1939" (as on the reverse disc of the original version), the reverse disc being blank. The wearing of Nazi era decorations in any form continued to be banned in the German Democratic Republic until German reunification in 1990.

    February 12, 2012

    Ethnic Minorities and Foreigners in Hitler's Army

    Ethnic Minorities and Foreigners in Hitler's Army

    Black Nazis: A Study of Racial Ambivalence in Nazi Germany's Military Establishment
    Tonight I watched a video titled "The Truth About Nazis, Niggers, Jews and God" by YouTube user tmotofga who I am subscribed to as his videos are enlightening and thought provoking.   In that video, he mentions that he has never seen any photographs of black Nazi nor any Nazis that were not caucasian, and as far as I can tell from his discussion, believes that all the Nazi soldiers were white, which is incorrect.

    Black Nazis II: Minorities and Foreigners in Hitler's Armed Forces: The Unbiased History
    Since YouTube only allows a limited number of characters for comments to respond, I decided to write this blog post due to the fact that it is not widely known that Hitler's armed forces was an ethically diverse one that not only include Germans and other Europeans, but Africans, Koreans, Arabs, Indians, Japanese, Turks, but even Muslims and Jews.    Since I myself have historical interests and have studied World War II extensively and am aware of the entire histories associated with it, I was aware of this fact, however, it is not common knowledge for the majority of people, simply for the fact that it is not taught, or people do not seek out to learn it on their own.

    The ethnic diversity of Hitler's armed forces is documented with evidence, and is the topic of Black Nazis: A Study of Racial Ambivalence in Nazi Germany's Military Establishment by Veronica Clark who followed up with a second book titled Black Nazis II: Minorities and Foreigners in Hitler's Armed Forces: The Unbiased History For Tmotofga's benefit, as well as my readers, I am including some photos to show diversity among Hitler's armed forces during WWII.

    Ethnic Diversity in Hitler's Army during WWII.

    Korean Soldiers of Hitler's Army

    African Nazi Soldier
    Indian Nazi Soldier